Upcoming Events

International | Anti-War / Imperialism

no events match your query!

New Events

International

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

Anti-Empire
Anti-Empire

offsite link Oregon Can’t Fight Wildfires Because I… Sun Sep 13, 2020 10:50 | Alan Macleod

offsite link Economic War With China Is the Final Ste… Sun Sep 13, 2020 09:51 | Brandon Smith

offsite link Russia to Defy ‘Maximum Pressure’, L… Sun Sep 13, 2020 09:17 | Tsvetana Paraskova

offsite link Trump Didn’t Start the Drone War. He J… Sun Sep 13, 2020 08:57 | Kelsey D. Atherton

offsite link Iraqis Dig Up COVID-Positive Dead to Reb… Sun Sep 13, 2020 08:05 | AFP

Anti-Empire >>

The Saker
A bird’s eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2020/09/13 ? Open Thread Sun Sep 13, 2020 05:00 | Herb Swanson
2020/09/13 04:00:01Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link Outcome of a disputed US vote: a ?Hot Fall? or an ?Icy Crusade?? Sat Sep 12, 2020 13:13 | amarynth
By Ramin Mazaheri and cross-posted with Press TV In the 21st century a disputed vote in the US presidential election is almost a 50-50 proposition: if November?s popular and electoral

offsite link Houthis Strike Riyadh With Missiles And Drones. Saudi Coalition Retreats In Yemen Fri Sep 11, 2020 17:42 | amarynth
South Front Late on September 10, the Saudi capital of Riyadh came under a missile and drone attack from the Ansar Allah movement (more widely known as the Houthis). The

offsite link Lebanese academic explains Khamenei?s roadmap for ?New Islamic Civilization? Fri Sep 11, 2020 16:59 | amarynth
Middle East Observer Description: The following is a translation of an Arabic article by Lebanese academic Dr Muhammad Mohsen Olleik, in which he analyses the roadmap by Iran?s Ayatollah Sayyed

offsite link Tucker: Anarchists are working to tear down America Fri Sep 11, 2020 16:42 | The Saker

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link Did RTE journalists collude against Sinn Fein?

offsite link Irish Examiner bias Anthony

offsite link RTE: Propaganda ambush of Sinn Fein Anthony

offsite link Hong Kong and democracy Anthony

offsite link Oliver Callan: Back in his box Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
A Blog About Human Rights

offsite link Right to Water Mon Aug 03, 2020 19:13 | Human Rights

offsite link Human Rights Fri Mar 20, 2020 16:33 | Human Rights

offsite link Turkish President Calls On Greece To Comply With Human Rights on Syrian Refugee Issues Wed Mar 04, 2020 17:58 | Human Rights

offsite link US Holds China To Account For Human Rights Violations Sun Oct 13, 2019 19:12 | Human Rights

offsite link UN Human Rights Council Should Address Human Rights Crisis in Cambodia Sat Aug 31, 2019 13:41 | Human Rights

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Zionism and The Wall Of Racial Segregation

category international | anti-war / imperialism | opinion/analysis author Friday August 08, 2003 19:02author by Dr. Khalaf al- Jarad – Teshreen Report this post to the editors

Those who are not fully aware of the essence and ideological rules and bases of Zionism,should look at the wall which Israel is now building as a security means or a reaction to the Palestinian intifada and the Palestinian martyrdom operations… But the fact is crystal clear. This wall practically represents the Zionist Movement in its beliefs, goals, means and ends. Israel itself is based on a lie and this lie is “God’s chosen people”

We all know that there are not common aspects between the Jews, and they do not form one independent race or nation. þ

Hundreds of studies and books have been written on the essence of Zionism and its racist ideology and those Zionist thinkers who strongly believe that the Jews form an independent race and pedigree and it must not be mixed with any other race. þ

The Zionist entity in occupied Palestine was set up on a racist theory and evil ideologies which stand against realities and human behaviour… Zionist ideologists like Haim Weizmann, Ben Gurion, Herzel and many others can be of great help to those who want to know the meanings of the wall of racial segregation being built nowadays by the Israeli government led by Ariel Sharon. þ

From the very beginning of the inception of the Zionist entity in Palestine, all forms of racism can be seen crystal clear against the Palestinian people. þ

Israeli laws and legislative measures concerning the Palestinian people in particular and non-Jews in general, show a racist ideology and a violation of the simplest rights of the human beings who are not Jews. þ

The law of return approved by the Israeli knesset in 1950 represents racial discrimination in the full meaning of the world… In fact, there are hundreds of Israeli laws which embody racial discrimination and racial segregation. þ

No one could convince the Zionist decision-makers in Israel that the wall is a real danger. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon did not pay attention to the warnings of the leaders of European Union, the U.N. and Russia. He is determined to accomplish this racial monument which is a real mirror reflecting the essence of the Zionist entity in Palestine… þ

Is it time now the civilized world reconsider the resolution No. 3379 dated 10/11/1975 passed by the General Assembly which confirms that زZionism is one form of racism and racial discriminationس. þ

author by Fintanpublication date Sat Aug 09, 2003 00:34author address author phone Report this post to the editors

It’s not the Jews who are racist, it’s the Arabs. It’s not the Jews who are imperialist, it’s the Arabs. It’s not the Jews who are fascists, it’s the Arabs.

Anyone with a brain can see that.

author by Saul J.publication date Sat Aug 09, 2003 00:36author address author phone Report this post to the editors

This thread is compromised by racism and holocaust denial. Please delete.

author by mr. aryan sharon – god’s chosen peoplepublication date Sat Aug 09, 2003 19:35author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Yes I agree. This thread appears to have been authored by an Arab who is obviously a pro-Palestinain sympathiser with a grudge against the state of Israel. It should be deleted immediately …

If not we will set the Anti-Defamation League on you ….

Related Link: http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/
author by JMcKpublication date Sun Aug 10, 2003 10:29author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Look at the way the Zionist scum try to obliterate the truth . They cry “Holocaust denial” and other such shit but the truth is in this article. It is the truth and it hurts ! Zionists are scum and Zionism is a dispicably cruel racist system.

Shut up you scum. You are a disgrace to Jews. But then most of you are probably right wing Christians, I wouldn’t be surprised these days. That might be why you harm Jews so much by associating them with this racist Imperialist system you call Zionism. Many intelligent Jews openly abhorr Zionism
and also run the gauntlet of “Holocaust denial”, “Anti-Semite”, etc, etc.

Zionism is racism. Israel is Imperialist and in illegal occupation. Their justification for their murder and abuse of Palestinians is based on the Bible and such crap as the ” Holocaust industry” as described so well by Norman Finkelstein in his book of the same name. They thus claim a unique moral justification for their crimes in palestine against Arabs, Christians and fellow semites.

author by Mikepublication date Sun Aug 10, 2003 17:57author address author phone Report this post to the editors

In the US we usually use the term “racism” for just conflicts where there is a difference in race, in other words, for ONE form of conflict among the many possible (ethnic, sectarian, etc.). And for a while I thought you guys were were just using that term inappropriately but recently I came across something….

Well maybe you Europeans still DO consider people of different ethnic groups different races =- just like the Germans considered Poles, Russians, etc. to be in a different race from their own. I mean there was this piece talking about conflict in Sweeden between Swedes and Sami (Lapps) and THAT was called “racial”. I’ve similarly noted English postings acting as if Pakistanis were of a different race. Maybe THAT is the explanation.

But back to the original article and the claim about how “separation” is unworkable and the folks over there in Israel-Palestine ought to be able to get along in one country in spite of ethnic and/or religious differences. Simple? Why don’t you folks on this site tell them how you managed to accomplish that on your island. Somehow with all this tulmult going on in the Middle East, I seem to have missed the announcement that you had finally reached a peaceful settlement of your conflicts and were united into one Ireland.

author by Jamiepublication date Mon Aug 11, 2003 00:25author address author phone Report this post to the editors

People who use abusive terms do their side of the argument no good at all. By the way, the Zionism is racism argument has long since been disposed of. In fact, it is anti-Zionism that is racism, as Zionism is commonly accepted in the West as the self-determination of the Jewish people in their homeland.

In any case, the link is to an article from the Washington Post last Thursday on the subject of the wall.

Related Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31912-2003Aug7.html
author by kokomeropublication date Mon Aug 11, 2003 10:52author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Racism is attempting to divide families composed of ethnic Palestinian residents of Israel (Israeli Arabs) and their spouses from the occupied territories. In this crude attempt at Nazi-style eugenics, the Israeli government intends to expel all of those spouses of such Israeli citizens not prepared to sign an oath of allegiance to the state of Israel.

Such oaths of allegiance and apartheid (penal laws) will ultimately fail as any Irish citizen will tell you.

Not only is this Israeli law this racist, as it applies only to Palestinians/Arabs, but one wonders how it is constitutional in Israel which claims to be a democracy. With laws such as this it has no right to claim that it is any better than its neighbours, in fact if anything it is worse in that the Israelis/Jews should know better.

And before the Zionist apologists get started with the excuses over security concerns, Israel already has legislation in place which has allowed over 6000 Palestinian political prisoners to be interned indefinitely (some for over 20 years) without trial, so they don’t need this law for security purposes. They need this law to divide Arab couples and prevent Israeli Jews from being outbred by their second-class Arab “co-citizens”.

author by iosafpublication date Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:53author address author phone Report this post to the editors

you have made the point this morning I wished to make. I learnt of this new marriage law this morning, and like lots else today it makes me sick.
In the 1930s throughout Europe inter-racial and inter-ethnic marriage bans were introduced and the main victims were the Jewish peoples.

author by Mordechaipublication date Mon Aug 11, 2003 14:17author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Not relevant to this thread but never mind. No-one in Israel is crazy about this law but it is fact that nearly 50 Israeli deaths in the last couple of years are attributable to murders committed by Palestinian terrorists who fraudulently took advantage of the former free marriage laws. The law’s purpose is simply to save the lives of the innocent. If the murders of innocent Jews stop it can be repealed, especially as it is only valid for one year at a time, and must be reviewed annually.

author by Mordechaipublication date Mon Aug 11, 2003 14:21author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Inherent hostility to Israel is simply good, old fashioned anti-Jewism in another disguise.

author by kokomeropublication date Mon Aug 11, 2003 15:22author address author phone Report this post to the editors

And before the Zionist apologists get started with the excuses over security concerns, Israel already has legislation in place which has allowed over 6000 Palestinian political prisoners to be interned indefinitely (some for over 20 years) without trial, so they don’t need this law for security purposes. They need this law to divide Arab couples and prevent Israeli Jews from being outbred by their second-class Arab “co-citizens”.

This comes against the backdrop of legal recognition for same sex Jewish marriages. Obviously there is nothing wrong with same-sex marriages, but its ironic to see the two pieces of leglislation introduced more-or-less at the same time. One progressive and the other repressive.

Frankly I am disgusted but not surprised at Israels tactics. The only thing certain is that they will fail, but not without having first caused a great deal of additional suffering to Israeli Arabs whose only “crime” is to have married a Palestinian from the occupied territories.

While you’re at it Mordechai, perhaps you would like to explain how preventing a married couple from living together and having children will protect Israeli civilians from shelling and suicide bombers? I am really interested to see what kind of logical knots you manage to tie yourself up in the effort.

author by Mordechaipublication date Mon Aug 11, 2003 16:28author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The marriage laws were abused by Palestinian terrorists to gain entry to Israel proper and murder people. This is the only mischief aimed at by the new temporary law. Do not seek to paint a different picture that does not accord with the facts.

author by kokomeropublication date Mon Aug 11, 2003 17:18author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Mossad agents were caught in Jordan a few years ago while travelling on forged Canadian passports after a failed assassination attempt.

However, neither the Canadians nor the Jordanians responded by preventing their citizens from marrying Israelis, nor did they prevent Israelis from travelling to their countries.

According to CNN:

Captured Mossad agents return to Israel

Two agents from the Mossad, Israel’s top secret spy agency, reportedly tried to kill Mashaal by injecting him with poison. The agents were captured by Jordanian officials; Mashaal survived.
Unrepentant Netanyahu: No compromise on terror

The assassination attempt angered not only Jordan but also Canada, because the Mossad agents were reportedly carrying forged Canadian passports.

Related Link: http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9710/06/israel.netanyahu/
author by dagdapublication date Mon Aug 11, 2003 17:44author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Remember the Jewish Victims -Forget the Goy Victims Dept.

“Reports over the weekend said about 60 Palestinians were arrested last week after the (Israeli) army killed eight people in Nablus…” -N.Y. Times, Aug, 7, 2001

It is standard media policy to quickly “forget” the names of Palestinian victims. The NY Times in the citation above is referring to the July 31, 2001 assassinations in Nablus that killed six Palestinian adults and two little Palestinian brothers: Bilal Abu Khader, 8, and Ashraf Abu Khader, 5. But their names, age and relationship are not given. They are lumped into a generic mass of “people killed…” Their names were provided in an Aug. 1 NY Times report. But merely six days later these little brothers have become already anonymous in the Aug. 7 edition of the NY Times. In 55 years Jewish victims of the Nazis have not become anonymous in the pages of the NY Times, but six days is all it takes for Palestinian child-victims to vanish down the Manhattan memory hole.

Jewish victims are not forgotten by the corporate western media. These media are always certain to commemorate Jewish victims. For example, the Associated Press reported on Tuesday, Aug. 7, 2001, “Tuesday’s shooting was just a few miles from where a pregnant Israeli woman, Tehiya Bloomberg, 40, was shot and killed Sunday night.”

Had the Bloomberg woman been a Palestinian, the AP would not have reported her gender, age, pregnant condition or name two days after her death. She would have been just a “Palestinian shot Sunday night.” It’s easy to forget nameless victims, but Ms. Bloomberg’s memory will live in the pages of the NY Times and the dispatches of the AP because she was Jewish. Bilal Abu Khader and Ashraf Abu Khader don’t rate commemoration because they are victims of Jews and according to the prevailing doublethink, it is “anti-semitic” to recall such victims, even if they were helpless Arab children.

Related Link: http://www.hoffman-info.com/palestine49.html
author by Mordechaipublication date Mon Aug 11, 2003 21:40author address author phone Report this post to the editors

1) It’s a stupid comparison, as the Mossad agents did not gain access to Jordan through marriage, nor are their activities a threat to the Jordanian population at large.

2) There are just as many instances of Israeli victims being anonomised or ignored in the media as Palestinian ones, if not more so.

author by kokomeropublication date Tue Aug 12, 2003 10:27author address author phone Report this post to the editors

In 1) you state that the Mossad agents did not gain access to Jordan through marriage, ie they didn’t need to.

Similarly Palestinian terrorists do not need to marry those resident in Israel to gain access, and in any case a known terrorist registering a marriage would completely remove the element of surprise and leave themselves open to even more scrutiny and/or surveillance.

Therefore the Israeli anti-Palestinian marriage law is completely spurious when it comes to “security” and is aimed at breaking up Palestinian families and denying them their fundamental human right to choose a partner and have a family, and represents the worst type of racist law imagineable.

The Israelis/Jews should know better than to go down this path!

author by Mordechaipublication date Tue Aug 12, 2003 11:54author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Well, they weren’t known terrorists and they did murder innocent civilians. This is a proven fact.

On the subject of the wall, we don’t have murders committed inside Israel by infiltrators from the Gaza strip for the simple reason that that territory is completely closed off by a security fence.

The wall, as you put it – in fact in many places, its just a fence, builds on this experience and is designed to ensure the same security benefit.

author by Sarahpublication date Wed Aug 13, 2003 05:23author address author phone Report this post to the editors

They’re stupid, because the more they bomb, the quicker the security fence will go up.

author by kokomeropublication date Wed Aug 13, 2003 11:11author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The really stupid thing here is the Israeli government trying to steal Palestinian lands and imprison them on the assumption the world would not notice it.

Another example of crass stupidity is the Israeli attack killing two Hammas members who were on ceasefire.

From this and other Israeli actions such as the aggressive overflights of southern Lebanon etc. etc. that Israel has no interest in a ceasefire as this slows up the building of the wall and the Anschluss of the West Bank.

author by Mordechaipublication date Wed Aug 13, 2003 14:11author address author phone Report this post to the editors

The so-called Hamas ceasefire is a fraud. By the way, it is Hamas that is committed to Israel’s total destruction.

author by kokomeropublication date Wed Aug 13, 2003 16:32author address author phone Report this post to the editors

until the Israelis stupidly assassinated two of their members provoking the backlash the Israeli right wished for.

The fact is that war is better than peace for the Israelis as it allows them perfect cover to expropriate yet more land from the Palestinians so that they can point to the huge cost of dismantling settlements as an excuse for holding onto land when pressured by the UN and the International community.

The wall is not about security, it is about making living conditions intollerable for Palestinians, whom right wing Israelis hope will leave.

As for Hammas or others being committed to the destruction of Isreal, BIG DEAL, I’m sure Sharon & Co. are really worried at the threats of a few loonies when they have their fingers on the buttons that control 200+ nukes and one of the largest and best equipped armies in the world.

Do us a favour and drop this excuse and save it for the Americans or other gullible people around the world, it is frankly not credible any longer.

It is Israel has both the means and the committment to pushing Palestinians out of the West Bank and into Jordan as many of your politicians have already suggested.

author by Mordechaipublication date Thu Aug 14, 2003 11:27author address author phone Report this post to the editors

You’re being disingenuous and are obviously an anti-Semite.

author by kokomeropublication date Thu Aug 14, 2003 13:39author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I despise name calling as it is the last refuge of those who don’t have an intellectual leg to stand on. Try arguing your case like an adult and you might get some respect.

Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2020 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy